Oscar nods show some surprises
Oscar nominations are out, and there aren’t too many surprises. Fans of the Spokane International Film Festival - some of them anyway - should be pleased to know that they’ve already seen one of the Best Foreign Language nominees, “Ajami,” which screened Sunday night.
Overall, the two films that have been trading honors back and forth all awards season - “Avatar” and “The Hurt Locker” - lead the nominess with nine each.
But eight nominations for Quentin Tarantino’s “Inglourious Basterds”? Including Best Picture, Best Director and Best Original Screenplay. Isn’t it time to recognize that Tarantino can direct scenes, he can write dialogue, but - at least with this film and his epic “Kill Bill” - he can’t write a complete picture that holds together beginning to end?
This year, of course, is the year that the Motion Picture Academy has upped its Best Picture category to 10, which makes the New York Times’ surprise over the cheesy sports film “The Blind Side” getting a Best Picture nod a bit surprising in itself. If there were just five nominees, it would be a surprise.
It is a bit of a surprise that “Blind Side” received the nomination and Clint Eastwood’s “Invictus” did not. Other than acting nominations for Morgan Freeman and Matt Damon, Eastwood’s film received nothing. Then again it’s probably time that Hollywood thank Sandra Bullock, who does successfully make an impact in the film without pulling all the attention from the central figure: the homeless-kid-turned-NFL-player Michael Oher.
One thing that doesn’t make sense to me is “Up” being nominated both for Best Motion Picture and Best Aminated Picture. Shouldn’t it have been one or the other? This is a perfect scenario for it falling victim to a split vote, giving the animated win to something such as “Fantastic Mr. Fox.”
That wouldn’t bother me too much as I liked Wes Anderson’s “Fox” film. But “Up” should win something.
Below: The Oscar nominations (pardon the ad).
Four comments on this post so far. Add yours!
You need a free site account to add comments, but don't worry, it's quick and painless — all we need is a name and an email address to verify. Create an account or log in below.


remio on February 02 at 11:41 a.m.
Gotta disagree with you on Tarantino. While “Kill Bill” might have had its slow moments, I thought “Inglourious Basterds” was one of the better movies I've seen in the past few years. Mixing spaghetti westerns with gialli and setting it in a mostly fictional WW2 setting worked quite well, I thought.
Avatar — technically stunning looking and definitely entertaining, but in the end, the script was predictable and cliche-filled, and the cinematography dull. Definitely not deserving of all those nominations.
“Up” should probably win best animated feature, but “Coraline” wasn't bad either.
Flag as inappropriate
Nathan W on February 02 at 2:54 p.m.
I wrote up a comment in which I expressed why Tarantino deserved to be nominated, that Matt Damon should have been recognized for “The Informant!” and not the bland, boring “Invictus,” and my love for Alfred Molina. But it didn't post. So…yeah.
Flag as inappropriate
Dan Webster on February 03 at 11:42 a.m.
Sorry, Nathan. I've had problems with postings, too, as I've written below. Frustrating, eh?
That said, I would love to read your comments re. Tarantino in general and “Inglourious Basterds” in specific. As I told Bob Glatzer, if there were a category for Most Memorable Moments, I would nominate Tarantino for all five (or 10) spots. But I just don't think “IG” holds together as a whole narrative. Plus I have specific problems with Tarantino's personal fetishes, his misogyny (at least as it plays out in “IG”) and the whole notion of revenge fantasy.
Is “IG” a watchable movie? No doubt. I think he still makes the most watchable films of anyone in Hollywood. But is it a worthy Best Picture nominee? Maybe at the MTV Movie Awards, but not for the Motion Picture Academy.
Flag as inappropriate
remio on February 08 at 1:15 p.m.
Misogyny? That's kind of a hyperbole, isn't it?
Flag as inappropriate